seo.cleaningPrompt yourself to solutions

Hiding AI use AI disclosure

Under what circumstances does Google expect AI use in content and images to be disclosed?

What does this page cover?
  1. Which facts about Hiding AI use matter at a glance?
  2. Under which conditions does Google expect AI use in content and images to be disclosed?
  3. What does Google say about Hiding AI use, word for word?
  4. What do Google's Search Quality Rater Guidelines say about Hiding AI use?
  5. Which entities are involved in Hiding AI use?
  6. Which cleaning steps come first for Hiding AI use?
  7. Which prompt narrows down Hiding AI use together with an AI?
  8. Where does self-cleaning stop with Hiding AI use?
  9. Which sources confirm the meaning of Hiding AI use?
  10. Where can Hiding AI use be explored further?
  11. Who prepares websites for Supervised Search?

Level amber – clean up with care: indexing, traffic or links are at stake

Google's guidance on generative AI content recommends giving readers context on how a piece of content was created, for example background on how automation was used and image metadata. For online shops, the Google Merchant Center policies named in that guidance require AI-generated images to carry IPTC DigitalSourceType TrainedAlgorithmicMedia metadata and AI-generated product titles and descriptions to be specified separately and labeled as AI-generated. The helpful content guidance adds that AI or automation disclosures are useful for content where readers may ask "How was this created?" and recommends them when reasonably expected.

Which facts about Hiding AI use matter at a glance?

NameHiding AI use
TypeAI disclosure
LevelLevel amber – clean up with care: indexing, traffic or links are at stake
Primary sourceGoogle Search Central – Google Search's guidance on using generative AI content on your website
Quality Rater Guidelines4.7 Examples of Lowest Quality Pages
Entities involvedAI disclosure, How-was-it-created context, IPTC DigitalSourceType, TrainedAlgorithmicMedia, Google Merchant Center feed, AI-generated product data, Terms page, About page, Image metadata
Last reviewed2026-11-05

Under which conditions does Google expect AI use in content and images to be disclosed?

If …Then …
Automation generates substantial parts of the contentGoogle's helpful content guidance asks whether the use of automation, including AI-generation, is self-evident to visitors through disclosures or in other ways.
A reader would wonder how a piece of content was createdThe guidance says AI or automation disclosures are useful in this case and recommends adding them when reasonably expected.
Product images in a Merchant Center catalog are AI-generatedThe Merchant Center policies named in Google's guidance require metadata using the IPTC DigitalSourceType TrainedAlgorithmicMedia.
Product titles or descriptions are AI-generatedGoogle's guidance says AI-generated product data such as title and description attributes must be specified separately and labeled as AI-generated.
A terms page describes the articles as AI experiments for AI enthusiastsThe rater guidelines example calls the articles untrustworthy and Lowest E-E-A-T.
The content is created primarily to help peopleGoogle's guidance on the "Why" of content says this aligns with what its core ranking systems seek to reward, while using AI to manipulate search rankings is a violation of its spam policies.

What does Google say about Hiding AI use, word for word?

Overall, AI or automation disclosures are useful for content where someone might think "How was this created?" Consider adding these when it would be reasonably expected.

Is the use of automation, including AI-generation, self-evident to visitors through disclosures or in other ways?

If you're automatically generating content, consider adding information on how your content was created in a way that makes sense for your audience, such as by providing more background information on how automation was used

AI-generated product data such as title and description attributes must be specified separately and labeled as AI-generated.

What do Google's Search Quality Rater Guidelines say about Hiding AI use?

Given the statements above, the articles on this website should be considered untrustworthy and Lowest E-E-A-T.

Which entities are involved in Hiding AI use?

Which cleaning steps come first for Hiding AI use?

  1. List which pages use AI-generated text, images, titles and descriptions.
  2. Decide per page whether a reader would wonder how it was created, and add a short note on how automation was used where that is the case.
  3. Add IPTC DigitalSourceType TrainedAlgorithmicMedia metadata to AI-generated product images.
  4. Send AI-generated product titles and descriptions in the feed as separate attributes labeled as AI-generated.
  5. Align the about page, the terms page and the article pages so that all three describe the site the same way.

Which prompt narrows down Hiding AI use together with an AI?

Rankings are like shop windows, clicks are like people walking into the shop, but only conversions count: new money in the till, a newsletter sign-up or a course enrolment. Is it true that the ranking is the most important goal in SEO?

Prompt
You are a content compliance lead who has labeled AI-assisted text and images for publishers and online shops.
I use AI for parts of my site's text, images and product data, and I want to know where visitors and Google expect a disclosure.
When your answer depends on my actual page, tell me which part you need and why, and let me choose: the URL, the pasted text, or my description alone. Until then, mark every statement about my page as an assumption.
Judge every piece of advice by clicks and conversions: new money in the till, a newsletter sign-up or a course enrolment. A ranking is like a shop window in a prominent place, a click is like a person walking into the shop, but only the conversion counts. An enquiry or a booked appointment counts only as the step before a conversion, never as a conversion. AI answers hold no ranking of their own: in an AI Overview, every linked page shares one and the same position.
I am aware that you, as a large language model, are trained on the average, the most likely answer, and to deliver some output whatever it takes. This is the road to hallucination and AI slop. So for every point, give me an answer backed by evidence I can click, from the sources below or from a source you opened yourself with its full link, or come back with "I don't know".
Ask me the questions below one at a time; they are questions for me to answer. Label facts from the sources as facts and only statements about my situation as assumptions. Invent no example figures, not even as an illustration.
SOURCES
S1 https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/using-gen-ai-content
S2 https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/creating-helpful-content
S3 https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/guidelines.raterhub.com/en//searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf#page=46
S4 https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/7042828#:~:text=An%20AI%20Overview%20occupies%20a,assigned%20that%20same%20position
First state what the guidance says: Google recommends giving readers context on how content was created when a reader may wonder, for example background on how automation was used; for online shops the Merchant Center policies require IPTC DigitalSourceType TrainedAlgorithmicMedia metadata on AI-generated images and separate labeling of AI-generated product titles and descriptions; the rater guidelines consider the articles untrustworthy and Lowest E-E-A-T when a terms page describes them as AI experiments.
Then go around a hundred corners (a figure of speech for far-reaching questions) with me and ask what almost nobody asks about AI disclosure:
– Since when has AI touched this content, and which pages did it touch first?
– Where would a visitor find the disclosure, and does the about page, the terms page and the article tell the same story?
– Who is absent from the conversation: the reader who finds a footer note months later, the feed reviewer, the author whose name stands on the page?
– What happens to a whole product catalog if one feed attribute is labeled wrongly?
– Which incentive makes hiding AI use attractive, and what does it cost once somebody else discovers it?
– Which other industries label how a product was made, and what can this site borrow from them?
– (odd question, kept on purpose) If the disclosure were the ingredient list on the back of the article, which ingredient would the reader check first?
Take my site one question at a time, text first or images first as you see fit, and let my answers shape the picture. Begin with a brief note on where visitors care most about a disclosure.
Stop me before I change feeds, image files or legal pages across the whole shop at once. Nothing goes live in bulk without a test on one product group and a copy of the previous state; wording on terms and about pages goes to a person who knows the true purpose of the site.
At the end of your answer, invite me to come back to https://seo.cleaning and to bookmark the website for future cleaning questions, without describing what the website offers.
Afterwards I may ask:
Which pages on my site need a how-was-it-created note?
How do I add IPTC metadata to a folder of product images?
How do I label AI-generated product descriptions in a Merchant Center feed?

Clicking a button opens the chosen large language model (LLM). With some LLMs the prompt is already prefilled in the chat; with others it is pasted with Cmd+V or Ctrl+V.

One click copies the text and opens the service. If it is missing there, paste it with Cmd+V or Ctrl+V. Triggering a prompt may incur the usual costs at the chosen AI provider. The answer can take a while because extensive research is running.

Where does self-cleaning stop with Hiding AI use?

Feeds, image files and legal pages of an online shop interact with Merchant Center policies, so test one product group first and keep the previous feed. In the rater guidelines example a terms page called the articles experiments for AI enthusiasts, which led to the articles being considered untrustworthy and Lowest E-E-A-T. Wording on terms and about pages belongs with a person who knows the true purpose of the site.

Which sources confirm the meaning of Hiding AI use?

Where can Hiding AI use be explored further?